Complaints & Investigations

Iowa law authorizes the Board to investigate complaints about dentists, dental hygienists, and dental assistants. If the Board finds that the practitioner has violated state law or the Board’s administrative rules, it may take action against the practitioner’s license to practice in Iowa.  The Board’s disciplinary procedures are located in 650 Iowa Administrative Code. You will find an overview of the disciplinary process below.

Complaints

The Board receives complaints from many different sources—patients and families, other health professionals, insurance companies, law enforcement, Medicaid, and others.  Regardless of how the information is received, the Board identifies each of these as a “complaint.”

How to File a Complaint

The Board office accepts complaints in the form of a letter, e-mail or on-line form.  Click here to fill out the on-line complaint form.You may also print it and fax it, or send it in by regular mail.  A complaint may be faxed to 515 281-7969.  Please mail complaints to the Iowa Dental Board at 400 SW 8th St, Suite D, Des Moines, IA 50309-4687.


If you write to the Board with your complaint, please include information about:

  • Your name, address and telephone number.
  • The patient: name, address, telephone number, date of birth, and your relationship to the patient.
  • The practitioner(s): name, address, telephone number, when the patient went to the practitioner(s) and why, and why you are making a complaint. Please describe your complaint adequately in your letter.

How Complaints Are Handled

As soon as a complaint is received, staff assigns a case number and opens an investigative file.  New complaints are reviewed and prioritized in order to determine the level of investigation appropriate for each complaint.  Some cases are referred to the Board for a decision at the next Board meeting on whether to investigate further, and some cases are assigned immediately to an investigator.

What Happens in an Investigation

The purpose of an investigation is to gather sufficient information from the view of the complainant and the licensee so that the Board can determine if the facts support that wrongdoing occurred.  
To get sufficient information from both vantage points, the investigator may:
interview those involved, e.g., complainants, licensees, and others;
obtain relevant records, e.g., dental records, X-rays, study models;
examine the licensee’s disciplinary history with the Board; and/or
contact law enforcement or other Boards.
The investigator gathers information and writes a summary report to the Board explaining what information was gathered. The investigator does not make conclusions or recommendations for the Board. The Board reviews the materials on each case and makes a decision.

What Kind of Complaints Receive Board Action

The Board uses its limited resources to focus on complaints that identify a significant danger to patients, including:  serious competency concerns, severe patient harm, criminal conduct, substance abuse or other impairment, sexual misconduct, and unprofessional conduct that impacts patient care.

Examples of concerns which the Board considers to be less serious include cases that do not involve serious patient harm or that are isolated occurrences rather than part of a pattern of inappropriate treatment, billing disputes, a single incident of rude behavior or communication problems, personality conflicts, or poor recordkeeping practices that are not repeated and do not significantly affect patient care.

While the Board may close a less serious case without taking any formal disciplinary action against the licensee, the Board may re-open the case if similar complaints are received later.  When a pattern of wrongdoing begins to emerge, the Board heightens its interest in complaints that on their own seem less concerning.

The Board’s Options When It Reviews a Case

Each Board member has a copy of the investigator’s report and all of the relevant records when the members reviews a case.  The legal standard the Board must meet to take public disciplinary action is called “probable cause” which means there must be better than a 50-50 chance that the wrongdoing occurred.

After discussing the case and considering the evidence available and the risk to the public, the Board takes one of these actions:

  • Dismisses the complaint and close the case without action.
  • Closes the case and issue a confidential Letter of Education or Letter of Warning to the licensee.
  • Continues the investigation by
    • Referring the case back to the investigator for further investigation;
    • Referring the case to peer reviewers for expert opinion; or
    • Ordering the licensee to submit to a confidential evaluation.
  • Files a public Statement of Charges and refers the case for prosecution to the Office of the Attorney General.
  • Summarily suspends some or all of the licensee’s privileges to practice and order a hearing within 30-45 days.  The Board issues an emergency suspension in the most serious cases when continued public harm is likely.

What Makes an Investigation Take So Long

A case remains under investigation until the Board decides to close the file or order a hearing.  The investigative process can take months or longer for some of these reasons:

  • The investigators receive and work on many cases at the same time.
  • A licensee/registrant may not be prompt in supplying records or a report.
  • A licensee/registrant may have to get a confidential evaluation that takes several weeks, even months to schedule.
  • Competency cases may require peer review before the Board can rule.
  • Board staff is investigating many cases concurrently.
  • The Board reviews cases at its quarterly meetings.

What Is Public Information and What Is Not

An investigation is confidential.  It cannot be shared with the public, the complainant or the licensee involved.  The public may know only when the Board files charges against a licensee.  Only then is the investigative file shared with the licensee who is charged.  The investigative file is never open for view of the complainant or the public.  The Board is careful to follow Iowa law on what records may be made public or shared with certain individuals or agencies and when that may occur. 

Prosecutions

Statement of Charges

The Board may file a Statement of Charges if it finds probable cause that a licensee violated Iowa law or the Board’s rules.  The statement of charges notifies the public that legal action is being initiated against the licensee/registrant and the licensee/registrant will be given an opportunity for due process.  The licensee/registrant is served with several legal documents that include charges and an order for a hearing.  This is the beginning of what is called a “contested case,” which makes a multi-step “due process” available to the licensee/registrant to defend himself or herself before the Board with opportunity for several levels of appeal. 

Once the Board files charges, the case is referred to the Office of the Attorney General and an Assistant Attorney General is assigned to prosecute the case on behalf of the “State,” meaning the public interest of Iowans.  Most licensees/registrants hire a private attorney to assist them through this legal process and to assure their interests are protected.

Settlement or Hearing

The Board office schedules a hearing when the two sides—the licensee/registrant and the State—have an opportunity to present evidence related to the charges to the Board.  State law encourages the Board to enter into informal settlement negotiations prior to the initiation of a hearing.  In most circumstances the State makes a settlement offer.  If no settlement is attempted or reached, the case proceeds to hearing.  The full Board (a quorum of the Board) hears the case. 

Whether a Hearing Is Open or Closed to the Public

The Board office notifies the public when a hearing is scheduled.  While a hearing may be open to the public at the discretion of the licensee involved, most licensees choose a closed hearing.  The decision to close the hearing to the public is often made at the beginning of the hearing.

Administrative Law Judge

An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) from the Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals presides over Board hearings.  The ALJ rules on matters of law and assists the Board in preparing the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order of the Board based on the evidence presented during the hearing.

Disposition of Cases

The Board has a range of actions that it is authorized to take following a hearing or as part of a settlement.  The Board may impose any combination of these actions it finds appropriate:

  • Dismiss the charges and close the case without formal action;
  • Dismiss the case and close it without action;
  • Issue the licensee/registrant a formal Citation and Warning;
  • Place a licensee/registrant on probation subject to monitoring or conditions;
  • Restrict a license/registration;
  • Suspend or revoke a license/registration to practice;
  • Accept a voluntary surrender of a license/registration; and/or
  • Issue a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000.

Appeals

Board actions are considered “public” documents and are posted on the Board’s website and reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank and the Healthcare Integrity Data Bank. All parties to a contested case then have the right to appeal the final decision of the Board within a time frame set by law.  When all administrative remedies are exhausted with the Board, the parties to the case may appeal the Board’s decision to the State’s courts.  In the meantime, the sanctions imposed by the Board are enforced.

Confidentiality

Investigative files, investigative reports, and other investigative information in the Board’s or peer review committee’s possession are privileged and confidential.  These materials are not subject to discovery, subpoena, or other means of legal compulsion for their release except to the licensee/registrant and the Board.  The Board may only release investigative materials to a licensee/registrant in cases where formal charges against the licensee/registrant have been filed.

Investigative information may, however, be released to the applicable licensing authority in another state in which the licensee/registrant is licensed or has applied for a license/registration.  It is not uncommon for the receiving state to halt the licensure process in that state until the Iowa Board completes its investigation and decision making.

If the Iowa Board’s investigative information indicates a crime has been committed, Board staff share the investigative information with the appropriate law enforcement agency, e.g., the local police or DEA.

Civil Immunities

Members of the Board, its staff and peer review committee members are protected by Iowa law from civil liability.  Board members and staff are immune from suit for their role in any act, omission, or decision of the Board, as long as they act in good faith.  A person who files a report or a complaint is also immune from civil liability if the reporter acts without malice.

Mandatory Reporting of Peers

State law requires a licensee to report a peer who may have violated the law or Board rules by omission or wrongdoing.  A person licensed by the dental Board is required to report someone else licensed by the dental Board, but not other health practitioners.  Licensee/registrant who fail to comply with mandatory reporting may be subject to Board discipline.

Top